A woman known only as Jane Doe filed a lawsuit in Clark County, Nevada. She claims Cardi B threw a microphone at her during a July 29, 2023 show at Drai’s Beachclub in Las Vegas. The complaint alleges assault, battery and negligence.
According to court papers, the rapper invited fans to splash water on her as part of the show. Doe says she acted accordingly. She lightly splashed her drink. In response, the lawsuit alleges Cardi B “suddenly and forcefully” threw the mic.
Doe reports the mic struck her in the face, causing physical injury, emotional distress, reputational harm and embarrassment. She also named Drai’s Management Group for failing to prevent the incident.
Legal Allegations And Emotional Impact
The complaint notes the mic was later auctioned for nearly $100,000. Doe claims that sale “exacerbated” her trauma. She is seeking compensatory and punitive damages, including for pain, suffering, and reputational damage — with at least $15,000 in general damages demanded.
Law enforcement closed a criminal investigation in 2023 due to insufficient evidence. That doesn’t bar a civil case. Nevada law allows battery and assault claims to proceed on a lower burden of proof.
Legal Response From Cardi B And Venue
Cardi B’s attorney, Drew Findling, dismissed the lawsuit. He called it a “transparent and pitiful attempted financial shakedown.” He stressed that local police and prosecutors closed the matter previously.
Doe publicly stated, “What has been written off as a joke by many people is actually a traumatic experience.” She added, “I’m seeking justice … no celebrity is above the law.” The complaint also holds Drai’s liable under negligence and premises law, arguing venue staff should have anticipated repeat conduct.
Next Steps And Broader Context
Nevada civil courts may award damages even if criminal charges were dropped. Doe must prove that Cardi B intentionally made harmful contact. She also must show that Drai’s had a duty to keep guests safe, and breached that duty.
If Cardi B is found liable, she could face compensatory damages for medical costs and emotional harm. Punitive damages may be considered if her conduct is deemed malicious or intentional.
A trial date has not yet been set. Legal experts say the case hinges on whether instructing the audience to splash water created a context where a mic‑throw could be seen as disproportionate or reckless. Precedent suggests self‑defense arguments must be reasonable to succeed.