Kamala Harris Slams Biden’s Second-Run Decision in New Memoir

NEW YORK, NEW YORK – SEPTEMBER 11: Democratic presidential nominee, U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris, and U.S. President Joe Biden, join family and friends at Ground Zero honoring the lives of those lost on the 23rd anniversary of the terror attacks of September 11, 2001, at the World Trade Center on September 11, 2024 in New York City. Biden and Harris will also attend ceremonies at the Flight 93 National Memorial in Shanksville, Pa, and the Pentagon in Arlington, Va., making visits to all three sites of the terror attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people. (Photo by Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)

Former Vice President Kamala Harris sharply criticizes President Joe Biden’s decision to seek a second term in her forthcoming memoir, calling it “recklessness.” Her critique, rendered in candid language, marks her first public rebuke of the campaign choice.

Harris writes, “Was it grace, or was it recklessness? In retrospect, I think it was recklessness.” She argues the choice was left to Biden and First Lady Jill Biden alone. That, she writes, was a grave mistake.

Still, she makes clear she never doubted his ability. “I don’t believe it was incapacity,” she states. “As loyal as I am to President Biden, I am more loyal to my country.”

Harris frames the campaign’s late shift as a failure of leadership. “This wasn’t a choice that should have been left to an individual’s ego, an individual’s ambition. It should have been more than a personal decision,” she writes.

Frustration at Marginalization by White House Staff

Harris recounts how White House aides failed to support her. She says staff “rarely” defended her against political attacks. She suggests they felt threatened by her success.

Her memoir notes aides operated under a “zero-sum” view: If she thrived, Biden dimmed. “None of them grasped that if I did well, he did well,” she writes.

Harris also describes dilemmas over whether to urge Biden to step aside. She feared doing so would appear self-serving or disloyal. “He would see it as naked ambition, perhaps as poisonous disloyalty,” she says.

Her memoir, titled 107 Days, details the brief and turbulent campaign that followed Biden’s withdrawal in July 2024. It is set for release on September 23, 2025, via Simon & Schuster.

The manuscript also lays the groundwork for a book tour across the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom later this fall.

Harris makes clear that while she criticizes the process, she does not question Biden’s competence. Instead, she says fatigue from age and travel made his limitations visible. “On his worst day, he was … more capable of exercising judgment … than Donald Trump on his best,” she writes.